Evaluation of Abortion Measures in Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 on The Right to Life of the Fetus From a Human Rights Perspective

Authors

  • Florencia Desiree Universitas Udayana
  • I Gusti Ayu Putri Kartika Universitas Udayana
  • I Gede Sastra Winata Universitas Udayana
  • Piers Andreas Noak Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v5i11.1023

Keywords:

Government Regulation, abortion, human rights, law, Criminal Code, right to life, fetus

Abstract

Indonesia has legalized abortion under certain conditions, such as pregnancy resulting from rape,
through Government Regulation No. 28/2004. This policy has sparked heated debate because it
contradicts the principle of protecting the right to life of the fetus. This study aims to provide a complex
overview of the issue of abortion in Indonesia and its implications for human rights. The method used is
normative legal research. This research is conducted by examining library materials or secondary data.
The two approaches used are a statutory approach related to the legal issue of abortion and a
conceptual approach to examine the medical legal understanding of abortion due to rape. Cases of
sexual violence and rape in Indonesia are still high. In 2023, Komnas Perempuan recorded 2,078 cases of
sexual violence, of which 143 were rapes. Abortion, in this context, is often used as a solution to address
unwanted pregnancies. This research shows that while Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 provides
legitimacy to abortion, it is still contrary to the right to life of the fetus guaranteed by law. While
abortion is considered a violation of the right to life, this policy is also considered a protection for
women victims of sexual violence. Despite arguments to protect women's rights, the right to life of the
fetus as a non-derogable right should not be ignored. Therefore, there needs to be a review of this
regulation to ensure that all human rights, including the right to life of the fetus, are optimally
protected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bourke, J. (2015). Rape: A History from 1860 to the Present. Hachette UK.

Filippi, V., Chou, D., Ronsmans, C., Graham, W., & Say, L. (2016). Levels and causes of maternal

mortality and morbidity. Disease Control Priorities, 2, 51–70.

Foster, D. G. (2021). The turnaway study: ten years, a thousand women, and the consequences

of having—or being denied—an abortion. Simon and Schuster.

Goodwin, M. (2014). Fetal protection laws: Moral panic and the new constitutional battlefront.

Calif. L. Rev., 102, 781.

Kuebelbeck, A., & Davis, D. L. (2023). A gift of time: Continuing your pregnancy when your

baby’s life is expected to be brief. JHU Press.

Ngema, N. M. (2023). Regulation of Abortion and Distribution of Contraceptives in the Context

Syntax Transformation: Vol 5 No. 11 November 2024 1305

of Indonesia’s Human Rights Obligations. Perspectives of Law and Public Administration,

(4), 582–589.

Organization, W. H. (2015). Strategies towards ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM).

Ratnawati, E. T. R. (2022). Aborsi Dan Hak Hidup Janin Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan

Kesehatan. Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(1), 1–13.

Sinambela, T. A., & Melatyugra, N. (2022). Ilegitimasi Aborsi Oleh Korban Perkosaan

Berdasarkan Hak Untuk Hidup Janin. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA, 5(2), 111–128.

Speckhard, A. (2022). Traumatic death in pregnancy: The significance of meaning and

attachment. In Death and trauma (pp. 67–100). Routledge.

Swanson, R. J., & Liu, B. (2022). Conception and pregnancy. In Fertility, Pregnancy, and Wellness

(pp. 53–71). Elsevier.

Woodman, M., & Sieff, D. F. (2014). Spiralling through the apocalypse: Facing the Death Mother

to claim our lives. In Understanding and Healing Emotional Trauma (pp. 64–88).

Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-26