Case Study of Economic Growth with the Act of Monopoly on Food Control in the Field of Poultry Farming from Upstream to Downstream by PT. Charoen Pokphand Indonesia Tbk

  • Indra Rahayu Universitas Pasundan
Keywords: Poultry Industry, Business Competition, KPPU

Abstract

This study discusses economic growth, that economic growth does not only provide positive impacts but also negative impacts such as the existence of monopoly crimes that grow because unfair competition practices are based on tight business competition because they are required to increase profits as much as possible. The company PT. Charoen Pokphand Indonesia Tbk (CPIN) is indicated to have committed a monopoly violation in controlling food in the poultry sector in its business activities. The purpose of this study is that the government is expected to be truly present in trying, and anticipating, and or overcoming crimes in the field of monopoly practices and unfair business competition. Namely in overcoming the practice of controlling products from upstream to downstream, the authority in this case is the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). This research method uses Normative Juridical analysis using secondary data with primary materials in the form of laws and expert opinions. The results of this study are that Business actors must implement Law No. 5 of 1999 Regarding Their Business Activities, and also the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) must take a legal approach to PT Charoen Pokphand Indonesia (CPIN). In this study it can be concluded that all independent farmers are in a very weak position. Because they do not have a bargaining position against suppliers who supply input components such as seeds, feed and medicine, and do not have bargaining power from the sales side, because the market is controlled by poultry integrators such as in this study PT. CPIN. So that monopoly practices occur in product control from upstream to downstream.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bisnis.com. (2023). Peternak Demo Harga Ayam Anjlok, Mendag Janji Panggil Charoen Pokphand Cs. Bisnis.Com. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20230110/12/1616740/peternak-demo-harga-ayam-anjlok-mendag-janji-panggil-charoen-pokphand-cs.

Effendi, B. (2020). Pengawasan Dan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Bisnis Digital (E-Commerce) Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Praktek Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 4(1), 21–32.

Fadhilah, M. (2019). Penegakan hukum persaingan usaha tidak sehat oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam kerangka ekstrateritorial. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(1), 55–72.

Halim, A. (2020). Pengaruh pertumbuhan usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi kabupaten mamuju. GROWTH Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(2), 157–172.

Hapsari, A. A., Matoati, R., & Viana, E. D. (2022). Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Subsektor Pakan Ternak yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). UPY Business and Management Journal (UMBJ), 1(2), 1–18.

Infovet. (2018). Saatnya Menata Industri Perunggasan. https://www.majalahinfovet.com/2018/12/saatnya-menata-industri-perunggasan.html

Juliswara, V., & Muryanto, F. (2022). Indonesia dalam Pusaran Globalisasi, Pengembangan Nilai-nilai Positif Globalisasi bagi Kemajuan Bangsa. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.

Komaludin, D. (2020). Model Manajemen Pengelolaan Pusat Olahraga Dan Rekreasi Melalui Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Berbasis Pengetahuan (Knowledge Based Worker). UNISA Edu, 1(1), 19–33.

Lestari, E. R. (2019). Manajemen Inovasi: Upaya Meraih Keunggulan Kompetitif. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Maulana, F. (2017). Dugaan terjadinya integrasi vertikal dalam usaha peternakan ayam pada UU No. 18 tahun 2009 tentang peternakan dan kesehatan hewan. Skripsi. Universitas Hasanuddin. Makassar.

Maulidya, A., Gunawan, J., & Ardiantono, D. S. (2020). Perancangan Perencanaan dan Pengelolaan Rantai Pasok Produksi Pakan Ternak Unggas di PT Charoen Pokphand Indonesia (Tbk) Sidoarjo, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni ITS, 8(2), D260–D264.

Nugroho, S. A. (2014). Hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Prabawani, R. D., & Kholil, M. (2017). Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Persekongkolan Tender Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jurnal Privat Law, 5(2), 77–83.

Sulandari, E. (2019). Pendahuluan 11.1. Pangan, Kebangsaan, Dan Ketahanan Nasional, 103.

Tektona, R. (2022). Quo Vadis: Kepastian Hukum Aturan Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha, 2(1), 43–54.

Zaini, A. (2019). Nilai Tambah dan Daya Saing Produk Unggulan di Kutai Barat. Deepublish.

Zihaningrum, A. (2016). Penegakan Hukum Persekongkolan Tender Berdasarkan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (Studi Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor: 16/KPPU-L/2014 tentang Dugaan Pelanggaran dalam Pengadaan Sarana Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di SD/SDLB di Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Probolinggo).

Published
2024-06-24