The Role of Work Motivation, Workload, and Competency in Influencing Employee Performance through Job Satisfaction

Authors

  • Thifa Amani Prahasyila Universitas Trisakti
  • Justine Tanuwijaya Universitas Trisakti
  • Andreas Wahyu Gunawan Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v5i8.996

Keywords:

work motivation, workload, competency, job satisfaction, employee performance

Abstract

In a dynamic and competitive financial industry, employee performance (performance) plays a key role in determining the success and growth of the organisation. This study aims to analyse the effect of work motivation, workload, and competency on job satisfaction, and its impact on performance in the financial industry in Jakarta.  This research uses quantitative methods by distributing questionnaires to employees in the financial industry in Jakarta. The data collected was then analysed using regression analysis to test the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable. The results showed that work motivation, workload, and competency have a significant effect on job satisfaction. Furthermore, job satisfaction was also found to have a significant effect on employee performance. These findings confirm the importance of paying attention to these factors in improving employee performance in the financial industry. Organisations need to develop effective strategies and policies to increase work motivation, manage workload, and develop employee competencies. By paying attention to these factors, it is expected to increase job satisfaction and ultimately improve employee performance in the highly competitive financial industry. This study concludes that work motivation, workload, and competency have a significant effect on job satisfaction, which in turn has an impact on improving employee performance in the financial industry. The findings provide practical implications for organisations to pay attention to these factors in an effort to improve employee performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akram, K., & Hilman, H. (2018). Effect of knowledge management activities and dynamic capabilities on employee performance in the banking sector: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Studies in Business and Economics, 13(2), 41–60.

Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). An empirical study of employees’ motivation and its influence job satisfaction. Ali, BJ, & Anwar, G.(2021). An Empirical Study of Employees’ Motivation and Its Influence Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(2), 21–30.

Bedarkar, M., & Pandita, D. (2014). A study on the drivers of employee engagement impacting employee performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 106–115.

Chinguwo, P. (2023). How Excessive Workloads and Long Hours of Work Contribute to Occupational Stress and Burnout Among Clinical Officers at Public Hospitals in Malawi. South African Review of Sociology, 53(1), 5–27.

Diamantidis, A. D., & Chatzoglou, P. (2019). Factors affecting employee performance: an empirical approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(1), 171–193.

Ghasemy, M. (2017). Capabilities and competencies related to leadership performance effectiveness in the context of change in Malaysian higher education institutions. University of Malaya (Malaysia).

Green Jr, P. I., Finkel, E. J., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Gino, F. (2017). The energizing nature of work engagement: Toward a new need-based theory of work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 1–18.

Hanafi, A., Soebyakto, B. B., & Afriyanti, M. (2018). The effect of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) and Quality of Work Life (QWL) on the employee work performance with motivation as an intervening variables at industrial affairs of South Sumatera province. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 6(09), 676–685.

Hong, W., & Gajendran, R. S. (2018). Explaining dyadic expertise use in knowledge work teams: An opportunity–ability–motivation perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(6), 796–811.

Hong, Y., Jiang, Y., Liao, H., & Sturman, M. C. (2017). High performance work systems for service quality: Boundary conditions and influence processes. Human Resource Management, 56(5), 747–767.

Iriani, N. I., Suyitno, S., Sasongko, T., Rifai, M., Indrihastuti, P., & Yanti, D. A. W. (2023). Leadership style, compensation and competence influence on employee performance through job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(1), 38–49.

Issa Gazi, M. A., Islam, M. A., Sobhani, F. A., & Dhar, B. K. (2022). Does job satisfaction differ at different levels of employees? Measurement of job satisfaction among the levels of sugar industrial employees. Sustainability, 14(6), 3564.

Jaya, L. H. S., & Ariyanto, E. (2021). The effect of vigor, dedication and absorption on the employee performance of PT Garuda Indonesia Cargo. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(4), 311–316.

Judge, T. A., Zhang, S. C., & Glerum, D. R. (2020). Job satisfaction. Essentials of Job Attitudes and Other Workplace Psychological Constructs, 207–241.

Kyndt, E., Berghmans, I., Dochy, F., & Bulckens, L. (2014). ‘Time is not enough.’Workload in higher education: a student perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 684–698.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-25