Dynamics of Law and the Transformation of the Mediator's Role in Resolving Industrial Disputes

Authors

  • Enny Kristiani Universitas Borobudur
  • Suparno Suparno Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v5i12.1030

Keywords:

industrial disputes, mediator, dynamics of law

Abstract

This research examines the legal dynamics and transformation of the role of mediators in the settlement of industrial disputes in Indonesia. The background of the problem arises from the increasing number of conflicts between workers and companies that require effective resolution through mediation. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and secondary data analysis, including labor laws and relevant court decisions. The results show that although mediators have an important role in encouraging amicable settlement, their legal position is still not optimal and is often ignored by the disputing parties. Existing regulations need to be updated to strengthen the role of mediators, including improving their legal position and competence through training. Mediators serve as a neutral third party in the dispute resolution process, but they face various challenges, such as limited authority and lack of recognition in the legal system. The increasing number of industrial disputes in Indonesia demands competent and authorized mediators. To increase the effectiveness of mediation in resolving industrial disputes, there is a need to update regulations that recognize mediation outcomes as legally binding decisions. In addition, raising awareness among workers and employers about the benefits of mediation is also crucial. Thus, mediation can become a more effective and efficient alternative in reducing the burden on the courts and maintaining good relations between workers and companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amelia, L. A. (2023). Legal protection for workers’ rights in the Indonesian labor system. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(2), 373–380.

Barsky, A. (2016). Conflict resolution for the helping professions: Negotiation, mediation, advocacy, facilitation, and restorative justice. Oxford University Press.

Colas, B. (2019). International Transfer of Clean Technologies: Mitigating Legal Obstacles.

Dhiaulhaq, A., De Bruyn, T., & Gritten, D. (2015). The use and effectiveness of mediation in forest and land conflict transformation in Southeast Asia: Case studies from Cambodia, Indonesia and Thailand. Environmental Science & Policy, 45, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.009

Dhiaulhaq, A., Gritten, D., De Bruyn, T., Yasmi, Y., Zazali, A., & Silalahi, M. (2014). Transforming conflict in plantations through mediation: Lessons and experiences from Sumatera, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 41, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.003

Dinata, A. W. (2021). The Dynamics of Ratification Acts of International Treaty Under Indonesian Legal System. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 10(2), 197.

Emirzon, J. (2022). Alternatif Penyelesaian sengketa di Luar pengadilan.

Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (2014). A work-nonwork interactive perspective of stress and its consequences. In Job Stress (pp. 37–60). Routledge.

Hapsari, D. R. I., Ilmiawan, A. A. S., & Samira, E. (2022). Non-litigation as An Environmental Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 2(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i1.20756

Hermawan, A. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengkata Hubungan Industria.

Lotko, M., Razgale, I., & Vilka, L. (2016). Mutual expectations of employers and employees as a factor affecting employability. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences.

Mofea, S. (2024). Inconsistencies in the reality of Employment Law in Indonesia in international legal conventions. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(4), 57–69.

Moore, C. W. (2014). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. John Wiley & Sons.

Pramono, A. (2020). Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes and Termination of Work Relations according to the Applicable Legislation. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 2(2), 169–194.

Ritonga, D., Fitrian, A., & Hendro, G. (2022). Execution of decisions of the industrial relations court with permanent legal force (Inkracht). Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues, 1(3), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i3.249

Rokhim, R., Januari, A. D., Atik, U., Shara, S., & Rusdayanti, N. (2020). Palm oil social conflict resolution and mediation in Jambi. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1), 1812831. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1812831

Rothman, N. B., Pratt, M. G., Rees, L., & Vogus, T. J. (2017). Understanding the dual nature of ambivalence: Why and when ambivalence leads to good and bad outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 33–72. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0066

Sarafis, P., Rousaki, E., Tsounis, A., Malliarou, M., Lahana, L., Bamidis, P., Niakas, D., & Papastavrou, E. (2016). The impact of occupational stress on nurses’ caring behaviors and their health related quality of life. BMC Nursing, 15, 1–9.

Sulistyarini, R., Budiono, A. R., Winarno, B., & Koeswahyono, I. (2018). The Benchmark of Freedom of Contract Under Indonesian Treaty Law (Cutomary Law Prespective). Journal of Law, Policy, and Globalization, 8(2), 20–33.

Yusa, I. G., Hermanto, B., & Aryani, N. M. (2020). No-spouse employment and the problem of the constitutional court of Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 11(1 (47)), 214–226.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-19