Application of The Dispute Referred for A Preliminary Ruling in Handling Criminal Cases Which Contains Civil Elements by Police Investigators

Authors

  • I Kadek Patra Universitas Mahendradatta, indonesia
  • H.Nurianti RS Universitas Mahendradatta
  • I Made Mulyawan Suabawa Universitas Mahendradatta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v6i4.1067

Keywords:

Criminal Case, Civil, Investigation, Prejudice Geschill

Abstract

The application of Prejudice Geschill, or prejudicial disputes, in criminal cases with civil elements in Indonesia remains a significant legal challenge. This concept allows the suspension of criminal cases when civil disputes must be resolved first, yet the Indonesian legal framework provides insufficient guidance on how investigators should manage such cases. This research examines the application of Prejudice Geschill during criminal investigations involving civil issues and explores the legal gaps in existing regulations, particularly Perma No. 1 of 1956 and SEMA No. 4 of 1980. The study uses an empirical juridical research approach, combining a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case study method to analyze Police Report Number: LP/B/15/III/2024/SPKT/POLRES GIANYAR as a case study. The findings reveal that while the law allows the suspension of investigations, the lack of clear procedural guidelines causes inefficiencies, leading to delays in both criminal and civil proceedings. The study suggests reforming the legal framework to provide more precise guidelines for investigators and the judiciary in handling cases with civil elements. Legal reforms could streamline investigations, reduce delays, and ensure more effective legal outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Rahum, et al. (2022). Thoroughly peeling the application of Geschil prejudice in criminal cases. Journal of Law LL-DIKTI Region IX Sulawesi, 11(2).

Astriani, N., Wibisana, A. G., Nastiti, A., Mutia, A. N. A., & Nuraini, H. (2023). Identifying the use of smart enforcement in Citarum River environmental law enforcement. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n1.a3

Ding, G., Li, Z., Chen, J., & Cai, X. (2021). An investigation on the bubble transportation of a two-stage series venturi bubble generator. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 174, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.08.022

Hakim, H. A., Praja, C. B. E., & Ming-Hsi, S. (2023). AI in law: Urgency of the implementation of artificial intelligence on law enforcement in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v14i1.a25943

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2012). Theory and the law of proof. Erlangga.

Hu, J., Xu, S., Wu, X., Wang, S., Zhang, X., Yang, S., Xi, R., Wu, D., & Xu, L. (2020). Experimental investigation on the performance of series control multi-stage reverse electrodialysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 204, 112284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112284

Letter Number B-1562/N.1.15/Eoh.1/05/2024 regarding the return of the case file (P-19) on May 23, 2024.

Rahayu, D. P., Faisal, Yokotani, Sari, R., & Satrio, N. (2020). Law enforcement in the context of legal culture in society. Law Reform: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33780

Reddy, K. S., & Sharon, H. (2017). Energy-environment-economic investigations on evacuated active multiple stage series flow solar distillation unit for potable water production. Energy Conversion and Management, 151, 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.064

Report on the results of the implementation of the case title on September 12, 2024.

Sidharta. (2006). Law enforcement problems. Rineka Cipta.

Soesilo, R. (1994). Criminal Code (KUHP) and its complete commentaries article by article. Politea.

Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 1956.

Telegram Letter of the National Police Chief Number ST/2540/XII/RES.7.5/2021 dated December 1, 2021.

Zulfa, E. A., Ismail, T. Q., Hayatullah, I. K., & Fitriana, A. (2023). Regulation and law enforcement on the protection of halal products in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2273344. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2273344

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30