Isolation Room Design: Indoor Environmental Quality, Theoretical Perspectives, and Future Considerations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v6i9.1108Abstract
Isolation rooms are critical healthcare facilities designed to contain infectious respiratory diseases through negative-pressure systems and environmental controls. In Indonesia, their design is guided by the Pedoman Teknis Ruang Isolasi (2014), which outlines standards for ventilation, lighting, acoustics, thermal comfort, and air quality. However, these regulations primarily emphasise infection control, with limited consideration of patients’ psychological and social well-being. This study aims to review Indonesian isolation room standards and evaluate them through the lens of Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) and environmental psychology theories, including the healing environment framework, Canter’s place theory, and person–environment fit. A Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) approach is proposed as the methodological bridge between regulatory compliance and patient experience. The findings indicate that while current standards ensure functional safety, they lack integration with patient-centred design elements that contribute to comfort, resilience, and recovery. The paper highlights the potential of incorporating smart technologies and adaptive systems to enhance flexibility and psychosocial support. These insights have significant implications for interdisciplinary collaboration in revising future standards, ensuring that isolation rooms not only safeguard against infection but also foster environments conducive to healing and well-being.
Downloads
References
Ackley, A., Olanrewaju, O. I., Oyefusi, O. N., Enegbuma, W. I., Olaoye, T. S., Ehimatie, A. E., Ukpong, E., & Akpan-Idiok, P. (2024). Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in healthcare facilities: A systematic literature review and gap analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 86, 108787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108787
Al-Benna, S. (2021). Negative pressure rooms and COVID-19. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 31(1–2), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458920949453
Al Khatib, I., Samara, F., & Ndiaye, M. (2024). A systematic review of the impact of therapeutical biophilic design on health and wellbeing of patients and care providers in healthcare services settings. Frontiers in Built Environment, 10, 1467692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1467692
Amoatey, P., Al-Harthy, I., Al-Mushaifari, M. A., Al-Jabri, K., & Al-Mamun, A. (2022). Effect of ambient noise on indoor environments in a health care facility in Oman. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(10), 15081–15097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16875-y
Andrade, C. C., & Devlin, A. S. (2015). Stress reduction in the hospital room: Applying Ulrich’s theory of supportive design. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.12.001
Andrade, C., Lima, M. L., Fornara, F., & Bonaiuto, M. (2012). Users’ views of hospital environmental quality: Validation of the Perceived Hospital Environment Quality Indicators (PHEQIs). Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.001
Bayer, C. W. (2020). Evidence-Based Design for Indoor Environmental Quality and Health. In Sustainable Built Environments (pp. 657–676). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0684-1_604
Brambilla, A., Del Pio, M., Morosini, R. R., & Capolongo, S. (2020). Effects of indoor environmental parameters related to building heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems on patients' medical outcomes: A review of scientific research on hospital buildings. Science of The Total Environment, 726, 138131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138131
Frontczak, M., & Wargocki, P. (2011). Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Building and Environment, 46(4), 922–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.021
Huisman, E. R. C. M., Morales, E., van Hoof, J., & Kort, H. S. M. (2012). Healing environment: A review of the impact of physical environmental factors on users. Building and Environment, 58, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.016
Lei, Q., Lau, S. S. Y., Yuan, C., & Qi, Y. (2022). Post-occupancy evaluation of the biophilic design in the workplace for health and wellbeing. Buildings, 12(4), 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040417
Muhamad, M., Zaki, S. A., Hagishima, A., Ali, M. S. M., & Razak, A. A. (2023). Healing environment correlated with patients' psychological comfort: Post-occupancy evaluation of general hospitals. Indoor and Built Environment, 32(1), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X221087645
Norouzianpour, M., Eshraghi Samani, M., & Mousazadeh, M. (2022). Building a satisfactory indoor environment for healthcare facility occupants: A literature review. Building and Environment, 225, 109288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109288
Pedoman Teknis Ruang Isolasi, Seri Perencanaan (2015).
Preiser, W. F. E., White, E., & Rabinowitz, H. (2015). Post-Occupancy Evaluation (Routledge Revivals). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713519
Qian, H., & Zheng, X. (2018). Ventilation control for airborne transmission of human exhaled bio-aerosols in buildings. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(S9), S2295–S2304. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.01.24
Setiati, S., & Azwar, M. K. (2020). COVID-19 and Indonesia. In Acta Med Indones-Indones J Intern Med (Vol. 52).
Tekin, B. H., Corcoran, R., & Gutiérrez, R. U. (2022). A systematic review and conceptual framework of biophilic design parameters in clinical environments. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 15(1), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867221118675
Uścinowicz, P., Bogdan, A., Szyłak-Szydłowski, M., Młynarczyk, M., & Ćwiklińska, D. (2023). Subjective assessment of indoor air quality and thermal environment in patient rooms: A survey study of Polish hospitals. Building and Environment, 228, 109840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109840
van Vianen, A. E. M. (2018). Person–Environment Fit: A Review of Its Basic Tenets. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104702
Zhao, Y., Zhan, Q., & Xu, T. (2022). Biophilic design as an important bridge for sustainable interaction between humans and the environment: Based on practice in Chinese healthcare space. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, 8184534. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8184534
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khrisna Prasadya Farras Ahmad, Iziq Eafifi Bin Ismail, Adila Binti Zakaria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
