Analisa Putusan International Center for Settlement of Investment Dispute terhadap Perkara No. ARB/12/14 dan ARB/12/40 dapat meningkatkan Imunitas Negara Indonesia sebagai Host Country

Authors

  • Friska Pasaribu Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v3i11.641

Keywords:

Immunity, ICSID, Arbitration, Host Country

Abstract

The right of immunity is the privilege of a country to protect and to run its function and authority. To maintain its immunity against foreign investors, Indonesia issues Law No. 30/1999 on Arbitrage and Alternative Dispute Resolution. The arbitration board is exerted to able become a fair alternative and to organize all legal aspects and substances which include national and international arbitration. It can be concluded that Indonesia as the host country has immunity. The research uses normative and descriptive analytical method by analyzing the verdicts through library research by gathering primary and secondary data qualitatively. The result of the research shows that Indonesia's immunity is implicitly recognized by International Center for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID) arbitration. It can be seen in the case of dispute in Churchill Mining Plc. and Planet Mining Pty. Ltd. This case is based on the action of the Kutai Timur Regent that revokes the business License of Mining. This state action is categorized as jure imperii that is legitimated since the Indonesian government does not do denial of justice, according to the Tribunal ICSID. This privilege of the Indonesian government proves that it has its own territorial sovereignty so that as a host country it has followed a fair principle in managing mining and foreign investment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adolf, H. (2004). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional", Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Adolf, H. (2014). Sengketa Penanaman Modal antara Investor Melawan Pemerintah Indonesia di Arbitrase ICSID. In Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Vol. 1).
Amalia, P., & Pratama, G. G. (2018). Indonesia dan ICSID: Pengecualian Yurisdiksi ICSID oleh Keputusan Presiden. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 48(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v48i1.110
Geraldi, A. R. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Investasi Melalui International Centre For Settlement Of Investment Dispute (Studi Kasus Pemerintah Indonesia Vs Churchill Mining). Tanjungpura Law Journal, 1(2), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v1i2.24252
Harris, D. J. (1991). Cases and materials on international law. London (UK) Sweet and Maxwell.
Ian, B. (1998). Principles of public international law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Khairandy, R. (2007). Pengantar hukum perdata internasional. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia (FH UII) Press.
Pavoni, R. (2011). An American anomaly? On the ICJ’s selective reading of United States practice in jurisdictional immunities of the State. The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, 21(1), 143–159.
Putra, I. B. W. (2008). Aspek-aspek hukum perdata internasional: dalam transaksi bisnis internasional. Refika Aditama.
Sjahputra, I. (2012). Pengantar Hukum Pasar Modal. Jakarta: Harvarindo.
Sood, M. (2012). Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-25