Implementasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah menurut Perma No. 1 Tahun 2016 pada Lingkungan Peradilan Agama

Authors

  • Dudung Hidayat Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v3i11.647

Keywords:

Sharia Economic Dispute, Mediation, Religious Court

Abstract

Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in court. Civil cases registered in the Court before entering into trial, must first be mediated with the help of a mediator. If mediation is unsuccessful, the case will proceed to trial and if mediation is not successful, the case will be null and void. The number of cases entered after the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 in the Religious Court is 6 cases. Of the 6 cases, 5 cases were unsuccessfully mediated and 1 case was revoked. This study aims to determine the implementation of mediation and the effectiveness of the application of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016, in the settlement of sharia economic disputes at the Wonogiri Religious Court. This research is a field research. Data collection was conducted by interviewing mediator judges of Wonogiri Religious Court and documentation. By using qualitative descriptive analysis techniques. The result of this research is that mediation at the Wonogiri Religious Court has not been effective, this is due to community factors or the parties. Due to one of the parties feeling on the right side, the absence of the parties, bound by a notary agreement and the losses arising from sharia economic disputes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhmad, N. (2020). Ensiklopedia Keragaman Budaya. Alprin. Google Scholar

Amriani, N. (2012). Mediasi: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Google Scholar

Ansori, A. (2016). Digitalisasi ekonomi syariah. ISLAMICONOMIC: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 7(1). Google Scholar

Astarini, D. R. S. (2013). Mediasi Pengadilan Salah Satu Bentuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Berdasarkan Asas Peradilan Cepat. In Sederhana, Biaya Ringan, Alumni, Bandung. Google Scholar

Diah Ayu, R. (2018). Implementasi Perma Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama Ponorogo. IAIN Ponorogo. Google Scholar

Firdaus, R., & Ariyanti, M. (2004). Manajemen perkreditan bank umum: Teori, masalah, kebijakan dan aplikasinya lengkap dengan analis kredit. Bandung: Alfa Beta. Google Scholar

Hidayatullah, M. S. (2020). Membumikan Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia (Sebuah Upaya Memasyarakatkan Ekonomi Syariah dan Mensyariahkan Ekonomi Masyarakat). Jurnal Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari (UIN) Antasari Banjarmasin, 14(2), 177–208. Google Scholar

Hudiata, E. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah: Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012: Litigasi dan Non Litigasi. UII Press, Yogyakarta. Google Scholar

Lubis, S. (2006). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana. Google Scholar

Mujahidin, A. (2012). Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Rasyid, R. (2015). Hukum Acara Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Google Scholar

Suadi, H. A., & SH, M. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Praktik Ed Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana. Google Scholar

Subiyanto, A. E. (2016). Mendesain Kewenangan kekuasaan kehakiman setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(4), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk944. Google Scholar

Waskito, A. B. (2018). Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(1). Google Scholar

Winarta, F. H. (2022). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan Internasional: Edisi Kedua. Bandung: Sinar Grafika. Google Scholar

Yulianti, H. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Visualization, Auditory, Kinestetik (VAK) Pada Materi Klasifikasi Makhluk Hidup Kelas VII SMP N 3 Lengayang. IAIN Batusangkar. Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2022-11-28