The Future of Education: How Mobile Learning, Microlearning, and Gamification are Revolutionizing Architecture Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v5i11.1025Abstract
Human education has undergone various cycles of reform, yet many current education systems still rely on rigid models that do not meet the individual needs of students. Along with the advancement of technology and the digital revolution, there is a need for significant changes in the way education is delivered, especially in architectural education. This research aims to explore how mobile learning, microlearning, and gamification can revolutionize architecture education by meeting the increasingly diverse needs of students. This research uses a descriptive methodology that combines case studies and literature reviews to analyze current phenomena in architecture education. Findings show that the implementation of gamification, micro-learning, and mobile learning increases engagement, customization, and flexibility in architecture learning. Students now seek learning experiences that are interactive and customizable to their personal needs. By utilizing AI-based tools and more dynamic learning methods, educators can create learning environments that are more productive and responsive to the demands of the digital age. Architecture education in Indonesia, in particular, needs to adapt to international standards and modern challenges such as environmental sustainability. This research underscores the importance of integrating new technologies in architectural education to create more relevant and effective learning experiences. By adopting a more flexible and technology-driven approach, architecture education can better prepare students to face challenges in the world of work.
Downloads
References
Adeoye, M. A. (2023). Influence of gamification elements on students’ academic performance.
Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 3(2), 105–112.
Ajijola, E. M., Ogunlade, O. O., & Aladesusi, G. A. (2021). The attitude of distance learners
towards the utilization of learning management system (A case study of National Open
University of Nigeria). Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 1(1), 53–62.
Alimi, A. E., Buraimoh, O. F., Aladesusi, G. A., & Babalola, E. O. (2021). University students’
awareness of, access to, and use of artificial intelligence for learning in Kwara State.
Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 1(2), 91–104.
Angraini, L. M., Susilawati, A., Noto, M. S., Wahyuni, R., & Andria, D. (2024). Augmented reality
for cultivating computational thinking skills in mathematics completed with literature
review, bibliometrics, and experiments to students. Indonesian Journal of Science &
Technology, 9(01).
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital
revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.
Li, H., Yang, W., & Chen, J. J. (2016). From ‘Cinderella’to ‘Beloved Princess’: The evolution of
early childhood education policy in China. International Journal of Child Care and
Education Policy, 10, 1–17.
Mansour, N. (2024). Students’ and facilitators’ experiences with synchronous and asynchronous
online dialogic discussions and e-facilitation in understanding the Nature of Science.
Education and Information Technologies, 1–33.
Marshall, H. W., & Kostka, I. (2020). Fostering Teaching Presence through the Synchronous
Online Flipped Learning Approach. Tesl-Ej, 24(2), n2.
Syntax Transformation : Vol 5 No. 11 November 2024 1300
Nykonenko, A. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on modern education: prospects and
challenges. Artificial Intelligence, 2, 10–15.
Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. The
Handbook of Global Education Policy, 128–144.
Shen, L., Song, X., Wu, Y., Liao, S., & Zhang, X. (2016). Interpretive Structural Modeling based
factor analysis on the implementation of Emission Trading System in the Chinese building
sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 214–227.
Tan, C. T. (2017). Enhancing the quality of kindergarten education in Singapore: Policies and
strategies in the 21st century. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy,
(1), 7.
Tawalbeh, M., & Al-Husban, N. (2023). EFL Students’ Perspectives on Activities Designed for
Asynchronous Discussion Forums: Transformative Practices. International Journal of
Technology in Education, 6(3), 507–520.
Tyner, K. (2014). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information.
Routledge.
Wang, Y., Fang, W.-C., Han, J., & Chen, N.-S. (2016). Exploring the affordances of WeChat for
facilitating teaching, social and cognitive presence in semi-synchronous language
exchange. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aryani Widyakusuma, Afriq Sarwarana Ramadhan Sudibyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
